80% of sales are won or lost in 3 seconds - Future of Marketing Keynote Speaker - Pardavimu formule

Trust is the Most Important Thing You Sell. Reputational risk - leadership, health, retail keynote

Funny stories about simple mistakes many companies make. Small things make MAGIC and often cost NOTHING to deliver well. Marketing Keynote for Confinn

Life's too short to do things you don't believe in! Why passionate belief in the true value of what you are selling or doing is the number one key to success. Secret of all leadership and marketing - keynote for 1100 people in Vilnius October 2021

Why you HAVE to MEET to close deals. Want to make change happen and innovate? Get your teams into the office. Sales beyond COVID. Marketing keynote speaker - 1100 people

Join me: Accenture SustainABILITY event, Lisbon, Portugal. Keynote on Sustainability and Technology

Future of Sales and Marketing beyond COVID - audience of 800 in Vilnius. Digital marketing, location marketing. How to create MAGIC in new marketing campaigns. Future of Marketing Keynote Speaker

Why this is boom-time for physical corporate events in some nations following COVID vaccinations - future of conferencing, keynote speakers. Get ready for hyper-agile pop-up events at short notice. Companies have to meet to survive. CALL NOW +447768511390

Huge Tomatoes from Exhaust Gas in Power Generation, and re-use of heat. Greentech Innovation, CO2 emissions reduction, energy and food industry - climate emergency keynote speaker - VIDEO

For YEARS I warned about new pandemic risks. Life beyond COVID - impact on health care innovation, vaccines, future of pharma research and drug development. Future of Health care Keynote Speaker and Physician who warned for years about new pandemic risks

Life Beyond COVID. Virtual Event Futurist Keynote Speaker.High audience engagement on COVID. Patrick Dixon is one of the world's leading keynote speakers on health care

Q+A on COVID: global impact - with Futurist physician advisor to corporations and government. COVID keynote speaker - health care trends

Designer babies - how biotech can help parents create a 'perfect' child - huge ethical questions about the future of human race

Futurist Keynote Speaker: Posts, Slides, Videos - What is Human Cloning? How to Clone. But Ethical?

Should genetic engineering or human cloning be used to create designer babies?

Every parent wants a perfect child - but what happens when a parent wants a designer child - a child built to order, a pedigree child, a super-breed, super-human or just a baby with higher intelligence? 

Sex selection is just the start of the process, a form of designer life: parents deciding that only a certain type of perfectly normal child will be allowed to be born.

Latest research is turning all these dreams into reality, using technology developed originally for use in animals.

The simplest way to a designer child is human cloning:  taking a cell from an adult and combining it with a human egg to make an identikit clone of the adult. 

This is the ultimate pedigree child with guaranteed genes. 

What is more, we know from tracking the life of the adult exactly what the designer baby will look like at the age of two, ten, twenty, thirty and so on. 

We know what diseases the designer person will be likely to catch.  We know a lot about the personality profile of the growing child. 

Studies of identical twins reared apart show us just how much more than we think is influenced by our genes.  Of course all identical twins are individuals who make their own choices, but our genetic makeup is extremely important in who we turn out to be.  There are technical hurdles still perhaps to be overcome before human cloning will be a reality but the race is on.

Another more difficult way to make designer people, or a super race, is to take sperm or eggs, or cells in a developing embryo, and add new genes to them. 

This is called germ cell alteration. Although this sounds very difficult, designer animals are made routinely using genetic engineering. 

Indeed, official government statistics show that almost a million designer animals were made in UK laboratories alone, many as transgenic animals, combinations of  more than one species - say a cat and a dog, or a mouse, fish and human (yes they have been made).  Usually only a tiny amount of genetic material is added, enough to influence development.

A third way is to alter cells after birth.  This is called somatic cell alteration.  Here, the effects will die out when the person dies, and will not be passed onto a second generation of designer babies. 

This is unlike the germ cell alterations which will always be passed into every generation afterwards - perhaps for thousands of years with totally unknown consequences for the future of the human race.

The technology for all these things already exists - with the exception of a practical safe method of human cloning.  And the costs of many of these techniques is falling dramatically.

For example, it is now possible to detect whether an embryo made by IVF is male or female for $5 in a few minutes, by analysing gene fragments in the fluid surrounding the developing embryo. The same technique can in theory detect a very wide range of genetic conditions or characteristics, without damaging a single embryonic cell.  

This was science fiction just a few years ago, when the only way to profile the genes of an embryo was to detach a cell from the embryo and analyse it before implantation.

The lesson of history is that whatever can be done, will be done somewhere, sometime by someone and designer people will no doubt be made. 

Expect these technologies to be used first by very wealthy people, media celebrities and so on, for reasons of personal preference, and also to prevent serious medical conditions.

When designer babies are born they will deserve the same love, care and emotional understanding as any other children - perhaps they will need a lot more.

However, we urgently need global agreement outlawing selection of children on the basis of sex, intelligence potential or any other characteristic in the normal range.  

We also need a similar ban on preventing implantation / birth of embryos / babies which would otherwise be born with relatively non-serious or curable medical conditions, or with risks of developing such conditions.

Do we really want to live in a world where only "perfect" children are tolerated?  And who decides what "perfect" is?

I'm not just talking about physical appearance or intelligence or musical talent, but also about types of personality, risks of mental health issues.

There are all kinds of unintended consequences of this.  For example, we know that great genius can carry with it all kinds of mental health risks.  

Prevent births of babies with particular genes which may be linked to an added risk - say - of bipolar disorder, and you might rob tomorrow's world of brilliant artists, musicians, writers, comedians, leaders and so on.

Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:

Thanks for promoting with Facebook LIKE or Tweet. Really interested to read your views. Post below.

February 11, 2013 - 17:29

why would you want to do that to your baby??? if they were not cloned and let's say the mom says "we wanted to clone you." the kid might think that they wouldn't be good enough for their perants..... think about how this will affect the children!!!!

February 25, 2012 - 23:18

we should have cloning but then no cuz we would all be like eachother... we wouldnt b new.... they would take over our lives

Reply to anonymous
January 18, 2013 - 13:03

Your mum

February 15, 2011 - 19:19
dragonball z


November 24, 2010 - 16:20

i have always wanted a sister, if i got cloned then i could have one! it would be spiffing.

Reply to coolkid
February 23, 2012 - 18:46
Re: clone

you r stupid the clone would be a babie so then would be so much younger than you. cloning is bad to the bone

October 21, 2008 - 03:32
NO... maybe?

I agree with cloning, but I think that changing DNA would be wrong and greedy unless it is a proven technology and for the good of the human race.

Reply to kai
February 11, 2013 - 17:31

no, i would never in my life want to do that to a child

Join the Debate! What are your own views?



Search for your future

Our cookie policy

We use cookies for statistical purposes. To comply with the e-Privacy Directive we need to ask your consent to place these cookies on your computer.

Your use of this site indicates acceptance of these terms. I accept