|
Reasons
Against Cloning - two videos
Human cloning: who is cloning humans and arguments against cloning
How human clones are being made - for medical research. Arguments for and against human cloning research. Why investors are moving away from human cloning and why human cloning now looks a last-century way to fight disease. Why some people want to clone themselves or even to clone the dead (and not just cloning pets).
WAIT FOR PAGE TO LOAD - PRESS PLAY - MAY NEED TO PRESS AGAIN
Watch
Second Anti Cloning Video
Should we ban human cloning?
Arguments against cloning
Many resources, articles, videos and free online book on cloning
ethics by Dr Patrick Dixon who is often described in the media as
a leading authority on the ethics of human cloning.
Here are three reasons why we should say no to cloning
- disadvantages:
1. Health risks from mutation
of genes - an abnormal baby would be a nightmare come true.
The technique is extremely risky right now. A particular worry
is the possibility that the genetic material used from the adult
will continue to age so that the genes
in a newborn baby clone could be - say - 30 years old or more on
the day of birth. Many attempts at animal cloning produced
disfigured monsters with severe abnormalities. So that would
mean creating cloned embryos, implanting them and destroying (presumably)
those that look imperfect as they grow in the womb. However
some abnormalities may not appear till after birth. A cloned
cow recently died several weeks after birth with a huge abnormality
of blood cell production. Dolly the Sheep
died prematurely of severe lung disease in February 2003, and
also suffered from arthritis at an unexpectedly early age - probably
linked to the cloning process.
Even if a few cloned babies are born apparently normal we will have
to wait up to 20 years to be sure they are not going to have problems
later -for example growing old too fast. Every time a clone is made
it is like throwing the dice and even a string of "healthy"
clones being born would not change the likelihood that many clones
born in future may have severe medical problems. And of course,
that's just the ones born. What about all the disfigured and highly
abnormal clones that either spontaneously aborted or were destroyed
/ terminated by scientists worried about the horrors they might
be creating.
2. Emotional risks
- a child grows up knowing her mother is her sister, her grandmother
is her mother. Her father is her brother-in-law. Every time
her mother looks at her she is seeing herself growing up.
Unbearable emotional pressures on a teenager trying to establish
his or her identity. What happens to a
marriage when the "father" sees his wife's clone grow
up into the exact replica (by appearance) of the beautiful 18 year
old he fell in love
with 35 years ago? A sexual relationship would of course be
with his wife's twin, no incest involved technically.
Or maybe the child knows it is the twin of a dead
brother or sister. What kind of pressures will he or she feel, knowing
they were made as a direct replacement for another? It is a human
experiment doomed to failure because the child will NOT be identical
in every way, despite the hopes of the parents. One huge reason
will be that the child will be brought up in a highly abnormal household:
one where grief has been diverted into makeing a clone instead of
adjusting to loss. The family environment will be totally different
than that the other twin experienced. That itself will place great
pressures on the emotional development of the child. You will not
find a child psychiatrist in the world who could possibly say that
there will not be very significant emotional risk to the cloned
child as a result of these pressures.
3. Risk of abuse of the
technology - what would Hitler have done with cloning technology
if available in the 1940s? There are powerful leaders in every
generation who will seek to abuse this technology for their own
purposes. Going ahead with cloning technology makes this far
more likely. You cannot have so-called therapeutic cloning
without reproductive cloning because the technique to make cloned
babies is the same as to make a cloned embryo to try to make replacement
tissues. And at the speed at which biotech is accelerating
there will soon be other ways to get such cells - adult
stem cell technology. It is rather crude to create a complete
embryonic identical twin embryo just to get hold of stem
cells to make - say - nervous tissue. Much better to take
cells from the adult and trigger them directly to regress to a more
primitive form without the ethical issues raised by inserting a
full adult set of genes into an unfertilised egg.
Watch
Anti Cloning Video
Dr Patrick
Dixon is author of Futurewise
, and is heavily involved in media
debates on genetics. Should
scientists be told when to stop? Web TV
Growing new tissue and organs - stem cell research
Bone marrow and other tissues could repair your brain, spinal cord and heart and cure diabetes or old-age blindness. Adult stem cells promise investor returns while embryonic stem cells and therapeutic cloning raise major ethical, legal, and image problems.
Search for more
on cloning on this site 80 videos - many on cloning ethics
Full
text of The Genetic Revolution - free online book by
Dr Patrick Dixon with whole chapter on human cloning ethics
- arguments for and against human cloning.
Human genetics
Press
/ TV | Lectures | Dr
Patrick Dixon | Future of Banking | Digital Consumers
Genetics and Cloning | Life
& Health | Global Change
| Search our site |