|
11 AIDS care
issues in the community

A missionary tradition Public
involvement Community support
Everyone cares for their
friends Isn't
care the responsibility of the government? The
test of unconditional love Is
our love always the same? Community
care or caring for our own? Building
on what we have Caring
in a hospice Why
hospices are setting the pace Cure
at all costs? Mildmay
Mission Hospital: a model for many Forming
a ten-year vision AIDS
orphans---how have churches responded? Sponsorship
in families Orphanages
may be needed Income-generation
projects

CHAPTERS: Introduction
1
The Extent of the Nightmare 2
What's so Special about a Virus? 3
When Cells Start to Die 4
How People Become Infected 5
Questions People Ask 6
Condoms Are Unsafe 7
Moral Dilemas 8 Wrath or
Reaping? 9
Some Life and Death Issues 10
When Church Members Need Help 11
Others Need Help Too 12
Saving Lives 13 Needle
and Condom Distribution? 14
Special Issues in Poorer Nations 15
A Ten Point Plan for the Government 16
A Global Christian Challenge Appendix
B Appendix C
Appendix D
Note: This chapter of The Truth about AIDS
by Dr
Patrick Dixon is the original text as published by Kingsway
in 1994 updated 2002 and may be reproduced with acknowledgment.
Search
this book.
- Latest
AIDS statistics, AIDS information - Africa AIDS Crisis - History
of AIDS - AIDS epidemic, India, Asia, Eastern Europe, Central
Europe, Russia, America, China
- AIDS
research - causes of AIDS - AIDS treatment - retroviruses - protease
inhibitors - cure? Antiretroviral therapy for HIV
- HIV
transmission, AIDS risk factors and HIV window period
- What
is AIDS? - HIV symptoms - AIDS symtoms - symptoms early HIV infection
- early signs infection
- How
reliable are condoms? HIV dating - reducing HIV transmission
- Life
and death issues - HIV medicine
- AIDS
FAQ - vaccine, treatment, AIDS testing, Africa, China, Children,
workplace discrimination, AIDS myths, origin of AIDS
- Moral
dilemmas - euthanasia and AIDS treatments
- AIDS
and the church - when church members need help
- Community
care - treatment, adults, children, orphans
- AIDS
education - AIDS awareness in youth and schools
- HIV
Prevention - needle exchange program and condom distribution
- AIDS
in Africa and HIV in Africa, HIV infected surgeons
- Ten
point AIDS management plan for governments
- A global Christian challenge - church response to AIDS
- Guidelines
for best practice in running HIV / AIDS programmes in developing
countries, plus many helpful case studies and stories (Africa
/ India / Asia)
- A Christian
response to AIDS - global AIDS challenge to the church (article
for Tear Fund)
Caring for church members is one thing, but what about those with
AIDS who are part of the wider community? They may be dying in the
most terrible conditions. Are we able to sit back and ignore their
plight? Incidentally their needs are largely the same and
the ten point guide in the previous chapter gives a good foundation
for action.
As soon as you talk about getting involved in some churches you
can sense a problem. Some say it is far more important to deal with
the root of the problem by preaching the gospel and seeing lives
changed. However, the teaching of Jesus makes it clear that both
need to go together. Evangelical churches emphasise the need to
preach the gospel. However, it could be said that evangelism without
love is an obscenity to God, because a gospel message without love
is a gross denial of what God is like. Love will always go further
than words to meet practical needs. As Christians, we are called
to love people as an expression of God's love---not as a means of
manipulating them into joining the church. We love because people
are worth it, made in the image of God.
The church pioneered many aspects of medical care that we take
for granted today. Almost all of the first hospitals and associated
caring agencies in many countries were started by Christians. Medical
care was spread all over the world by a small army of dedicated
men and women who often died abroad of the very illnesses they went
out to fight. Their living conditions were dire and primitive in
Africa, Asia, South America or China.
A missionary
tradition
(return to index)
These men and women were driven by an overwhelming compassion for
those in other nations, many of whom they felt were often without
care and without hope. For them, bringing treatment for leprosy,
malaria, tuberculosis or smallpox was bringing the practical love
of God. As a result of that work, churches in South America, Africa
and Asia are the fastest growing in the world, at a rate enormously
faster than the birth rate. These countries are now sending missionaries
to Europe, the United Kingdom and the United States.
I cannot find a closer parallel to leprosy a century ago than AIDS
today. Now is the time for the church to climb off the fence, to
stop taking pot-shots at the tip of the iceberg---the bit they see
(erroneously) in the West as consisting entirely of promiscuous
homosexual men and drug addicts---and to start considering the whole
picture: the millions of men and women dying worldwide, and those
dying on our doorstep. God calls us to accept all people and extend
his love to them, regardless of whether or not we agree with what
they do.
Public involvement
(return to index)
Church leaders and their congregations need to be visibly involved;
not just seen to be caring for their own. They need to be quoted
in the local press, on local radio, and down on record in the national
media as declaring a commitment to get involved. The message is
that we care about what is happening and want to make a difference.
Leaders especially need to come forward and to be examples---filmed
talking to people with AIDS, holding their hands, receiving communion
with them, or giving them a hug. At the end of the day, actions
like these are things that really encourage others. Fears are not
dispelled by words alone, but by seeing that people are not afraid.
If church leaders cannot do this, our efforts to mobilise a congregation
will become hollow.
Community
support
(return to index)
Is it practical to set up a small community support group to help
those outside the `family' of the church? How could we go about
it? What about those who cannot be cared for at home? Could we use
a church building to provide some sort of residential care or hospice
for those who cannot manage at home?
Experience has shown that these things are possible in a wide variety
of community settings, whether in a country like the UK or one like
Uganda. The approach may vary greatly according to the local situation,
but the overriding principles of compassionate care remain the same.
Everyone
cares for their friends
(return to index)
Jesus said that caring for our friends, or members of our own social
networks, is something that everybody does: it is a great sign of
his kingdom. He said that true love is to care for those who are
not members of our own family; people we would not associate with;
people we do not like and might not be naturally drawn to. In fact
Jesus went even further and told us that we were to love our enemies,
those who want to stab us in the back, those who run us down, those
who hate us, those who undermine us, those who attack us, those
who are against us.
If this is the test of true love, then we can never be content
to care just for our own. The test of true love will be our willingness
to care for others in our community and for children left behind,
without any hidden agenda or additional motive other than that which
drove the Good Samaritan.
Jesus wants us to care as the natural response of our nature to
the need of those around us. He wants us to care because he cares
and we are channels of that care. As people come into contact with
us, and feel our touch, our love, our compassion, they are coming
into contact with something of Jesus himself.
As we have seen in a previous chapter, this is a mystery. As we
enter a room we carry his presence into the place. I remember as
a junior doctor, working in a busy hospital, I came into contact
with a great number of staff. Once or twice I came home and talked
to Sheila my wife about a particular nurse on one of the wards who
seemed to radiate something I had come to recognise in the past.
She had never said anything, neither did she wear some kind of
badge or symbol. I remember after some months, with slight embarrassment,
I asked her if by any chance she was a Christian. Of course the
answer was that she loved the Lord very much. It showed. She carried
the aroma of Christ with her. You can smell believers as they walk
into the room!
So our calling then is not to shut up the love of God in some kind
of Christian ghetto just caring for each other, but to allow that
love to be expressed through caring for others.
Isn't
care the responsibility of the government?
(return to index)
Some say that it is the responsibility of the government to care,
not the church. I believe it is the responsibility of both. One
of the primary responsibilities of government is to spread wealth
and resources by collecting taxes and providing services and benefits,
whether in education, health care, road building or other ways.
The balance between individual, group and government responsibility
is a political question, but one thing is clear. As Christians we
are called to be a nation's conscience, responding to need ourselves,
and also encouraging a compassionate government response.
Where possible, I believe it is entirely right and proper that
the government contributes to or provides some or all of the running
costs of church-based care and prevention programmes, so long as
the running of those programmes remains within the church and there
is not a loss of control. We need to be careful that Christian initiatives
do not become mere extensions of government or international agencies.
That is why we need such a clear vision about what God is calling
us to do. Without that we will be rapidly swept off course by someone
else's vision, politics or priorities.
The issue is care for people, closely linked to social justice
and basic human rights. If I am healthy, well fed and have a high
standard of living, then the teaching of Jesus is that my `neighbour'
has an expectation perhaps that he or she will not starve or be
deprived of the basic necessities of life. The church is one vehicle
for provision; voluntary agencies and government departments are
others. All can work together to get the job done.
Partnership between church and funding agencies can impose useful
disciplines. It can help us think through what we are doing, as
well as encourage us to measure our effectiveness and to plan strategically.
In many developing countries, the government depends on international
aid, often channelled through Christian agencies, with projects
overseen jointly by the donor and national government. These arrangements
are often very successful, because governments are able to tap into
an established network of Christian medical missions that have been
providing first-class care and prevention programmes in the country
for decades.
The
test of unconditional love
(return to index)
The test of unconditional love is twofold when it comes to AIDS.
First, does it matter to you how someone came to be infected, or
why someone's parents have died? Will that knowledge alter the way
you see that person or the way that person is treated? Many people
feel it is easier to care for an orphan or a dying baby than for
an adult who is ill. That is certainly the situation in Romania.
Everyone wants to help AIDS babies, and the care of adults or prevention
can almost be ignored. But is that the way of Jesus? Our love is
unconditional because it is the same expressed to all, regardless
of how they have come to be ill.
Is
our love always the same?
(return to index)
The second practical test of unconditional love is perhaps even
more important and is this: two people are dying with AIDS, and
one has indicated he or she would like to become a Christian. Does
this person get better care than the other? If so, then our care
has become conditional. This is a real challenge to us and should
cause us to consider how we think and respond to a variety of situations
in the church.
Some may react here by pointing out that there is a sense in which
God's love is full of conditions---this is the basis of God's judgement.
Perhaps Chapter 8 needs
reading again to see the whole thing in balance.
Community
care or caring for our own?
(return to index)
If the care has become conditional in subtle ways on whether
the person shows signs of wanting to join our church, then the programme
needs redefining. It is not really community care at all, but just
an extension of church life. That may be fine to you, but other
agencies may be extremely reluctant to ask you to help, unless it
is to care for those who already have a strong Christian faith.
Building
on what we have
(return to index)
The advantage of home care is that you do not need a building,
or even a formal office, in order to begin. You can start by resourcing
the work from within the existing structures and facilities of the
church. Indeed, it is possible to provide very effective AIDS care
through general care programmes, so long as people are adequately
trained, and those with AIDS locally are willing to receive help
from a non-specialist agency. As we have seen, in most countries
of the world the church has a huge established caring network, and
a long track record of delivering high-quality care. There may be
other care programmes running already which can be extended or adapted
to help those with AIDS. There are no blueprints for success. You
will need to adapt lessons others have learned to your own situation.
Care at home is fine as far as it goes, but what do you do when
care at home is impossible? What about hospices?
Caring
in a hospice
(return to index)
Even if we set up a community programme, there may be people we
are caring for who cannot manage at home. For a variety of reasons
they may need to be cared for in a hospital or a hospice. Many churches
have access to buildings, or may consider buying one. How can we
tell if this is a sensible way forward, and how can we make sure
the project will be successful?
Why
hospices are setting the pace
(return to index)
Over the years, I have talked to a number of people who were set
on starting some kind of hospice or in-patient unit for those with
AIDS, whether in a country like Uganda or in the UK. What exactly
is a hospice? The hospice movement has grown enormously over the
last twenty-five years, having had its origins in the UK earlier
this century.
It is aimed at providing a place where those with terminal illnesses
can find peace and security in a specialist environment with a particular
expertise in symptom control. Hospices are usually separate from
hospitals, are often independently funded, and seek to provide emotional
and spiritual support, as well as practical care.
The hospice philosophy spread fast from the 1970s onwards in the
UK at first and then elsewhere because traditional medicine seemed
obsessed with cure and had little time for the incurable. At the
same time, those with symptoms such as pain were often very badly
treated. Hi-tech medicine has sometimes lost touch with the needs
of people. Thus the drive to build these hospices often came from
relatives of loved ones who had died badly.
When AIDS became more and more evident, most of those who were
ill in many countries were treated at first by specialists in either
sexually-transmitted diseases or chest problems, neither of whom
had much experience of looking after the dying.
The aim is to help people die well by caring for them as whole
people, physically, emotionally, socially and spiritually. The unit
of care is not just the person who is dying, but also the family,
or the group of people around that person.
However we do need to be 100% certain that a dedicated unit for
HIV really is the most appropriate solution, keeping in mind facilities
available for other conditions in the country. It may be a
very poor use of resources to have a well fitted out specialist
AIDS unit in a city where general medical and surgical facilities
are extremely limited. In that situation a separate AIDS facility
is a luxury that cannot be afforded and is likely to be a magnet
for many with a huge variety of other conditions. On the other
hand, centres of excellence can provide a wide range of services
supporting other hospitals and clinics as well as training of large
numbers of health care workers.
There is a real need for expert advice. For example, you may have
access to a property, but after all the costs of conversion you
may still not have the building which is practical. It may be better
to build something from scratch.
Forming
a ten-year vision
(return to index)
You will need a steering group or committee prepared to see the
vision through and sustain it. You need long-range plans and vision---for
at least ten years. It may take you three of those years to get
from agreeing the plan to being able to welcome your first patient.
It is all too easy to go bankrupt with a beautiful building. Most
people like to see something for their money, so they give to capital
projects and are less happy to support staff salaries. Other approaches
can be considered. For example, there may be a need for something
more like a halfway house between what you would expect in a hospice
and what could be provided at home.
One common solution has been to adapt an institution that was built
for another reason, and is now redundant - for example a centre
for leprosy or for those crippled by polio.
AIDS
orphans---how have churches responded?
(return to index)
Whenever we care for young people who are dying, we find children
swept up in the process. Churches have responded in many creative
ways, depending on the local situation. I remember visiting
a Ugandan village where many adults had died. At first there were
just a few orphans, but numbers had grown rapidly. In Africa, a
child who has lost even one parent is likely to be in big trouble,
because the family may already have been living at a subsistence
level. To lose both parents is usually a disaster, especially if
the family is large with maybe six or more dependants.
There were 400 orphans in the village, so what should be done?
Many grandparents were spending their time trying to help bring
the children up. The children had no source of income, no one to
pay their modest school fees, so they had dropped out of school.
Nearby was a village that had been closed by the government. The
generation of parents had been wiped out. Only grandparents and
children were left, and the village could not survive.
It is easy to march in and build orphanages as residential institutions
providing love, education and care, but this may not be the best
answer. There may be a simpler approach. Attending to one area of
need may release the community to provide the rest.
If school fees can be found, the problem can be greatly eased.
It is a tragedy that the local schools, which may offer an excellent
education, may be half-empty because AIDS orphans are dropping out.
It can be unfortunate to educate them separately as this may reinforce
the separation and stigma. It can also be a mistake to house them
separately. Isolation from village community life may make integration
more difficult later on as adults. They may have difficulty finding
husbands or wives as they do not belong. Institutions can never
provide the same experience of home as a family.
Sponsorship
in families
(return to index)
For these reasons, an effective way to help in a country like Uganda
can be to provide school fees. Often this is all that is needed.
The children are then back in class with their friends. They are
supervised and may even be fed in the middle of the day. Sleeping
accommodation at home is often far less of a problem and in some
countries in Africa the food supply may be adequate and inexpensive.
Families usually grow most of their own.
Sponsorship in homes means that hundreds of orphans can be cared
for individually in as normal an environment as possible. It is
low cost with few extra staff needed. The staff role becomes that
of a community visitor, advising, monitoring, supporting and encouraging.
Sponsorship schemes are funded by a number of different relief and
development agencies, such as TEAR Fund, in partnership with local
churches and national agencies.
Every country and community is different and we need to be very
careful about transporting models that seem to work from one place
to another. It may be that with very little outside help, local
people are able to set up a school of their own. I have seen
very inspiring examples of what can be done with almost nothing
by villagers with faith, determination and vision. But there
is more to survival than school. Many children with no parents
need to be taught how to grow food, repair their homes and sell
their produce.
Orphanages
may be needed
(return to index)
Although we have seen that community placements can offer good
provision at low cost in some countries, it may not always be possible.
If the network of extended families and village resources is totally
overwhelmed, then institutional help may be the only alternative.
The principles of running such places are the same as for any other
orphanage project. It is good not to separate those who are orphans
because of AIDS from those orphaned by other events such as war,
tuberculosis, accidents or malaria. In practice it's hard
to separate children out on this basis in any case. Orphans
are orphans and in many cases of younger children they may not even
be certain of what killed mother and father.
The scale of the problem defies comprehension. In many areas at
the moment, nine- or ten-year-old children are acting as Mum and
Dad to younger brothers and sisters, often after nursing their own
parents until they died. The children have to collect firewood and
water, cook their own food---and grow it---supervise young ones
and repair their homes. They have nothing.
Just a very little help can make all the difference. One project
in Eastern Uganda has been helping children rebuild their huts,
so at least they have somewhere safe and dry to sleep at night.
The workers also give out food and other essential items.
Income-generation
projects
(return to index)
There are often situations in developing countries where a small
amount of capital and training can equip people to become self-sufficient.
Small micro-loans can make all the difference - for example to buy
a bicycle so that charcoal can be carried from the field beside
the house up onto the main road and down into the main city.
It's not only orphans who are growing up and need to provide for
themselves. Older women who have been bereaved or who are
otherwise vulnerable may have no means of survival, shelter or subsistence
except through sex. In some countries the women may be seen as commercial
sex workers; in others they may be seen as bar girls, or `kept women'.
In Uganda there are thousands of women without family support or
jobs. Many survive through the gifts of a number of men who stay
with them regularly when in town. AIDS campaigns are useless to
those who will starve without providing sex. A small cottage industry
can enable a number of women to find a new life, with new freedom,
dignity and control over their own lives---lives free from the constant
fear of exposure to HIV. For example, in one area a group of women
were given pigs and other livestock to breed and sell, as well as
to feed themselves and their families. These issues are also important
in countries like Thailand. One project has set up a needlework
industry for former sex workers.
As in every area of this terrible epidemic, it is easy to feel
totally overwhelmed. Where do you start? How do you begin to tackle
such a vast, global, growing problem? The answer is to start somewhere.
As has often been said, you cannot change the whole world, but
you can change someone's world somewhere.
If as a result of your help an adult with AIDS is able to die at
home, free of pain and at peace; if a family recently orphaned are
taken into a home and cared for together until they grow up; if
as a result of an AIDS lesson five young people are still alive
in ten years' time who would otherwise have died of AIDS, then you
have indeed made a big difference. Just think what 100, 1,000 or
10,000 people could do together. Even more so, the whole church
across your country, across the continent, across the world.
Jesus did not heal all the sickness in the world. He came and touched
the lives of those around him, giving hope and purpose to a suffering
world. As we ask God to show us who our neighbour is, his answer
could involve us in the lives of those in another continent, or
in the lives of those who live next door.
Some are called to give care in practical ways. Others are neither
called nor gifted to set up or be involved in projects, build hospices
or start agencies. However, there are so many other ways to be supportive:
prayer, financial help, encouragement---to name but a few.
Prevention is even more important than care - if you think about
the future
Whenever we begin caring for those with AIDS, we are faced with
a terrible thought. Here are a growing number of people dying of
a very unpleasant and incurable disease, yet every day many more
are becoming infected, becoming ill, dying or becoming orphans.
If we cannot cure it and the virus is spreading so fast, then we
must urgently do all we can to prevent further tragedy and destruction.
Our greatest moral challenge is to spend as much time, energy and
finances on saving lives as on caring for those affected by HIV.
You can give all the care in the world and not beat AIDS - you will
be busier every year. You can spend all your efforts on prevention
and maybe, just maybe, all the care programmes will have to close
down because there is nothing left for them to do. There is
a middle way: we fight the disease, and care for those affected.
Both should go hand in hand. But what is actually happening
in almost every church-related programme across the world is neglect
of prevention in favour of care. This is a route to future
disaster. Churches talk about both, but their actual SPEND
on prevention is usually tiny compared to care / orphan support
/ income generation and so on.
But prevention is difficult. It's easier in some ways to
set up a care programme. What is our message? Can Christians
agree? We need to decide what to tell our children, since
they are in the frontline of danger, and we need to tell them in
a way that is most likely to help them see the risks and change
their behaviour. School is an ideal place to start, but what do
we say and will our message actually change behaviour?
A
Missionary tradition Public
involvement Community support
Everyone cares for
their friends
Isn't care the responsibility of the government?
The test of unconditional love
Is our love always the same?
Community care or caring for our own?
Building on what we have
Caring in a hospice
Why hospices are setting the pace
Cure at all costs?
Mildmay Mission Hospital: a model for many
Forming a ten-year vision
AIDS orphans---how have churches responded?
Sponsorship in families
Orphanages may be needed
Income-generation projects
Contents Page
Main Global Change
Site Search
Press
/ TV | Lectures | Dr
Patrick Dixon | Future of Banking |Digital Consumers
Genetics and Cloning | Life
& Health | Global Change
| Search our site |